PHILOSOPHY 350. Kant: Critique of Pure Reason

Ferit Güven

Reading Questions

Prefaces to first and second editions, pp. 5- 40.

1. What is Kant's “revolutionary” idea?

2. What is Kant's definition of metaphysics?

3. What do “a priori” and “a posteriori” mean?

4. What does “intuition” mean?

5. What does “thing-in-itself” mean?

6. What is the purpose of a critique of pure reason?

7. What is the positive and the negative value of critique?

8. Why will a critique of reason decide the question of the possibility of metaphysics?

9. What are speculative reason and practical reason? How do they differ?

10. What is the difference between dogmatism and critique?


Introduction, pp. 43-68.

1. What are the criteria for a judgment to be a priori?

2. What is the difference between pure and empirical cognitions?

3. What does Kant mean by the term “cognition”?

4. What are the “unavoidable problems” of reason?

5. What is the distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments?

6. How is the analytic-synthetic distinction related to the a priori- a posteriori distinction?

7. What are synthetic a priori judgments and how are they possible?

(This is a fairly broad question that requires a general understanding of the CPR, therefore you should confine your answer to what Kant says in the Introduction keeping in mind that this question will be answered in various degrees of depth later in the text)

8. Why does Kant argue that mathematical propositions are synthetic? Show how arithmetic propositions (such as “7+5=12") are synthetic.

9. What is the general problem of pure reason?

10. What is transcendental philosophy?


Transcendental Aesthetic, pp. 71-84.

1. What does Kant mean by the term “aesthetic”?

2. What is a transcendental aesthetic?

3. What is intuition?

4. What does “sensibility” mean?

5. What is the distinction between sensation and intuition?

6. What is the distinction between the matter and form of sensation?

7. What is the distinction between pure and empirical intuitions?

8. What is the distinction between intuitions and concepts?

9. Why is space a priori?

10. Why is space an intuition rather than a concept?

11. What does it mean that space is empirically real and transcendentally ideal?


Transcendental Aesthetic, pp. 85-104.

1. How does Kant argue that time is not a concept?

2. How does Kant argue that time is a priori?

3.  What are the parallels and differences between space and time?

4.  How does Kant argue that space and time do not belong to things-in-themselves?

5.Why is the unknowability of things-in-themselves necessary for the possibility of synthetic a priori propositions?

6. What is an intellectual intuition?  Is human intuition intellectual or sensible?

7. What is the general purpose of the transcendental aesthetic?

 

Transcendental Logic, pp. 105-150.  

1. What are the two sources of our cognition?

2. What is the difference between pure and empirical logic?

3. What is the difference between pure and transcendental logic?

4. What is the difference between applied and transcendental logic?

5.  What is the distinction between pure and empirical concepts?

6.  What is the distinction between analytic and dialectical logic?

7. What does transcendental analytic consist of?

8. Why is understanding discursive? What does this mean?

9. What is the relationship between judgments and understanding?

10.  Why are concepts predicates?

11. What is the table of judgments? Why is it complete?

12. What is synthesis?

13. What is the relationship between the table of judgments and the table of categories?

14. What are categories?    

15. What is the distinction between dynamical and mathematical categories?

16. What is a deduction in general, according to Kant?

17.What is a transcendental deduction? What is its task?

18. Why do we need a transcendental deduction for pure concepts but not for pure intutions?

19. What does Kant mean when he writes that “the presentation alone makes the object possible”?

20. What is the concept of an object?

 

Transcendental Deduction, pp. 150-203.  

A-deduction (150-174) Transcendental Deduction [First Edition]

1. What is the synthesis of apprehension? What is the synthesis of reproduction? What is the synthesis of recognition? How do these three syntheses relate to each other?

2. What is Kant’s argument (A102) concerning the necessity of reproduction in imagination?

3. How is Kant’s definition of understanding and concepts in this section that is different from his previous definitions?

4. What is an object of presentations?

5. What role does the transcendental unity of apperception play in the A-deduction?

6. How is the unity of the object possible for Kant?

7. What is the role of imagination in the A-deduction?

8. How does Kant define nature?  How is understanding legislative for nature?

 

B-deduction (175-203) Transcendental Deduction [Second Edition]

9. What is the fundamental aim of the transcendental deduction?

10. What is transcendental apperception? How does it differ from empirical apperception?

11. What is the synthetic unity of apperception? What function does it have in the transcendental deduction?

12. What is the role of imagination in the B-deduction?

13. Why can we not think an object without categories? 

14. Why is the unity of consciousness necessary to justify the application of the categories to the objects of experience?

15. What is the main difference between the A-deduction and the B-deduction?

 

Reading Questions: Schematism, Axioms, and Anticipations, pp. 204-247.

1. What is schematism?

2. What is a schema?

3. Why is a schema needed?

4. What is the relationship between the schema and time?

5. What is the relationship between schemata and categories?

6. How are schemata different than images?

7. What is the difference between concepts and principles?

8. How is the principle of contradiction (a rule of general logic) applicable to the transcendental logic?

9. What is the supreme principle of all synthetic judgments?

10. What are axioms of intuitons?

11. What are anticipations of perception?

12. What are extensive and intensive magnitudes? How do they differ?

 

Reading Questions: Analogies, Postulates, Refutation of Idealism, pp. 247-302.

1. What are the analogies, and how are they different from axioms and anticipations?

2. How does Kant define substance?

3. How does Kant define causality?

4. Why can’t we order experience temporally in different ways?

5. Why are the analogies regulative?

6. What are the postulates of empirical thought?

7. Why does outer experience provide the basis of inner experience?

8. Why does the consciousness of my existence prove the existence of objects outside me?

9. What is the kind of idealism Kant refutes?

10. How does Kant’s refutation of idealism relate to the distinction between appearance and thing-in-itself?