If you are wanting to use QwikiWeb for your own website, there is an easy way to delete all the existing tiddler content and start over with a blank copy. This option should be used with caution as it will erase every tiddler in the existing file. \n\n''How to DeleteAllTiddlers:''\n#Make sure that you have downloaded the QwikiWeb file and are viewing that copy on your computer\n#Make sure that you are in EditMode by clicking on the "show advanced options" command. The DeleteAllTiddlers feature will not activate if EditMode is not enabled.\n#Use the save changes command so that you have a backup of the tiddler content (enable backups if necessary)\n#Click in the search box and type in the phrase DeleteAllContent\n#You will be asked to confirm that you want to delete the tiddler content; click OK to proceed\n#All tiddlers will be deleted, and you will be presented with a screen where you can setup new values for the site title, subtitle, main menu, etc.\n#When you have completed your edits, save the changes again to preserve your new content
|!To use this theme, you must rename its tiddler title to ColorTheme|\n''You can use either ColorNames or HexCodes to define the following colors:''\n\n|The ''Background'' color for the main reading area of the page|\n:colBackground=\n\n|The ''Banner'' color is also used for WikiWord links and the sidebar commands text|\n:colBanner=#000080\n\n|SiteTitle text color|\n:colSiteTitle=#b5b7f5\n\n|SiteSubtitle text color|\n:colSiteSubtitle=white\n\n|SiteTitle/SiteSubtitle link color|\n:colTitleLineLinks=#4455EE\n\n|SiteTitle/SiteSubtitle link color on mouse hover|\n:colTitleLineLinksOnHover=#b5b7f5\n|The ''menu'' background color is also used for links in the title/subtitle, toolbar buttons color, the tiddler links in the sidebar tabs, and the references button pop-up|\n:colMainMenu=#fefebf\n\n|The ''sidebar'' background color is also used for hyperlinks and wiki words in the title/subtitle, and the toolbar button text, and the toolbar buttons on mouse hover|\n:colSidebar=#b5b7f5\n\n|Sidebar commands link text color (search, etc.)|\n:colSidebarCommands=#000080\n\n|Timeline tab background|\n:colTabTimeline=#4455EE\n\n|Date sub-headings for the Timeline tab|\n:colTimelineHeadings=#000030\n\n|All tab background|\n:colTabAll=#000080\n\n|More tab background|\n:colTabMore=#2001cd\n\n|The text color used for the body text of tiddlers when they are visible|\n:colTiddlerText=\n\n|The ''Deselected Tiddler'' color is used when the mouse is not hovering over a tiddler|\n:colDeselectedTiddler= \n\n|The ''Selected Tiddler'' color is used when the mouse is hovering over a tiddler|\n:colSelectedTiddler=#ffffef\n\n|The ''Animation'' color is used for the animated box that grows and scrolls when a tiddler opens|\n:colAnimation=#b5b7f5\n\n|Text color for ExtendedFormatting Headers|\n:colHeaderText=#000080\n\n|Background color for ExtendedFormatting Headers|\n:colHeaderBackground=#b5b7f5\n\n|Text color for Table Header Cells|\n:colTableHeaderText=#000080\n\n|Background color for Table Header Cells|\n:colTableHeaderBackground=#b5b7f5\n\n|If you want to change the color or style of anything more specific, you can use the CustomStyleSheet|
:userModeWeb=readonly\n:userModeLocal=editor
The original TiddlyWiki code by JeremyRuston is ©2005 by [[osmosoft|http://www.osmosoft.com]].\n\nThe QwikiWeb code additions are ©2005 by AlanHecht.
[[Shirky: Ontology is Overrated|http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html]] — Categories, Links, and Tags\n\nQuotable bits:\n<<<\n “My God. It’s full of links:\n the URL gives us a way to create a globally unique ID for anything we need to point to”\n\n “Great Minds don’t think alike:\n By forgoing formal classification, tags enable a huge amount of user-produced organizational value, at vanishingly small cost.”\n\n “Market Logic:\n If you find a way to make it valuable to individuals to tag their stuff, you’ll generate a lot more data about any given object than if you pay a professional to tag it once and only once.”\n\n “Signal Loss from Expression:\n With tagging, when there is signal loss, it comes from people not having any commonality in talking about things.\n With a multiplicity of points of view the question isn’t “Is everyone tagging any given link ‘correctly’”, but rather “Is anyone tagging it the way I do?”\n If there is no shelf, then even imagining that there is one right way to organize things is an error.”\n\n “Filtering done post hoc:\n In a world where publishing is cheap, putting something out there says nothing about its quality. It’s what happens after it gets published that matters. If people don’t point to it, other people won’t read it.”\n<<<\nStart using [[del.icio.us|http://del.icio.us/]] seriously!\n\n----\nJune 30 2005
From :\n[[Latin Sayings, Latin Phrases, Latin Quotes and Latin Quotations|http://www.yuni.com/library/latin_4.html]]\n\n* Me transmitte sursum, caledoni! - Beam me up, Scotty!\n* Mater tua criceta fuit, et pater tuo redoluit bacarum sambucus - Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries\n* Mihi ignosce. Cum homine de cane debeo congredi - Excuse me. I've got to see a man about a dog\n* Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum! - Don't you dare erase my hard disk!\n* Nill illigitimi carborundum - Do not let the bastards get you down\n
[[LimeWire's Live Wire|http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/07/issue/forward_limewire.asp?trk=nl]] \n\nInterview in [[Technology Review|http://www.technologyreview.com/index.asp]] with Mark Gorton CEO of filesharing app //limewire//\n\n!!!Supreme Court: MGM vs Grokster\ndecision Jun 27th 2005. Vital links:\n\n* [[TechnologyReview.com - Grokster Decision|http://archives.trblogs.com/2005/06/grokster_decisi.trml]] : brief announcement with two links\n* [[Waiting for Grokster|http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/06/wo/wo_060305hellweg.asp?trk=top]] : good overview of issues. No links.\n* [[EFF: MGM v. Grokster|http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/]] Electronic Frontier Foundation's comprehensive page on this issue. More links here than you know what to do with.\n* [[Open Source » Blog Archive » Grokster?|http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/06/27/grokster/]] Open Source radio show. Listen to [[this podcast|http://stream.publicbroadcasting.net/ros/open_source_050627.mp3]]\n\nQ: What was the //Sony// or //betamax// rule about? (listen to the above podcast). How does the case ''add'' to the //Sony// rule? Take a look at [[sony v universal|http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=464&invol=417]]\n\nThe assertion is made: "mass use of copyrighted works" -- is this really the case?\n\nThe news as it happened. [[Grokster Loses - Unanimously - Inducement Test?|http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/2005/06/27/grokster_loses_unanimously_inducement_test.php]] June 27th [[Corante|http://www.corante.com/]] blog.\n\nJune 28th Corante [[Kicking the Sony Can Down the Road|http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/2005/06/28/kicking_the_sony_can_down_the_road.php]] : rather important overview of the whole issue. Key words:\n* innovation promoters\n* active inducement -- imputed inducement. What's the differentiation between these? What's is the author implying?\n* analysis of the Supreme Courts on the active inducement test is ... fact specific. What does //fact specific// mean in this context?\n* P2P Kool-Aid\n\n''Uncertainty'' : \nHow would this decision act as a roadmap detrimental to small innovative developers?\n\n Grokster and Bittorrent are Open Source apps. How does this decision affect the Open Source development community? [[Grokster and Open Source: Will Open Source Force the Court to Confront Sony?|http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/2005/06/28/grokster_and_open_source_will_open_source_force_the_court_to_confront_sony.php#26888]] \n\nLior Strahilevitz writes in [[Picker MobBlog: Is Grokster Erasing “Capable” from Sony?|http://picker.typepad.com/picker_mobblog/2005/06/is_grokster_era.html]]\n\n<<<\n//Sony// established a dichotomy. Defendants’ products were capable of substantial noninfringing uses and therefore not liable, or incapable of substantial noninfringing uses and therefore liable. Grokster does two things. First, it established a new middle-category (“maybe liable”), in which facts like how the product was marketed and designed will be decisive on contributory copyright infringement. Second, it shifts some products from Sony’s safe harbor into the liable category and the middle category. Products that lack plausible and likely non-infringing uses are potentially liable, according to all nine Justices.\n<<<\n\nIn [[kicking the sony can ...|http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/2005/06/28/kicking_the_sony_can_down_the_road.php]] Ernest Miller disagrees:\n\n<<<\nWhile Justice Ginsburg ignores the future potential for peer-to-peer, Justice Breyer revels in it. Lior Strahilevitz argues that Grokster may have erased the future potential from Sony (Is Grokster Erasing “Capable” from Sony?). I disagree, "capable" has always been rooted in reality. I could use a gun to hammer nails, but that does not mean that a gun is "capable" of being a hammer in the sense that "capable" is used in Sony.\n<<<\n\n ''Time is on our side'' Ernet Miller announces -- what reasoning does he have for his optimism? Why is this decision better than what could have happened (see previous paragraph)?\n\n\n----\nJuly 01 2005\n
Implement some of Textile2 . Eg\n\n* title attribute for links <a> and images <img>\n* equivalent to M.T's plugin 'smartypants'. This turns " " into “ and ” and [[c]] into copyright etc.\n* mechanism for floating graphics right or left with caption\n* date/time autoappended (optional) to a tiddler as in a regular wiki\n* definition list implementation\n* Trackback -- JS ping.\n\n----\nJune 30 2005
[[Picker MobBlog: Copyright and Product Design|http://picker.typepad.com/picker_mobblog/2005/07/picker_copyrigh.html]]\n\n<<<\nGoogle Video consists of three parts: a video viewer; a search engine; and an upload service through which content creators can make their videos available. The video viewer plays back files only if they are stored on Google servers. At least that’s how it worked for four days, until Jon Johansen of DeCSS fame—posted code to remove the restriction. (See c|net for more on that.) The technical link between the video viewer and the content service is interesting in its own right, especially since Google contemplates future fees in connection with video downloading.\n<<<\n\nInteresting.\n\nOther Grokster links:\n\n* In 1999 [[cypherpunk manifesto|http://bitconjurer.org/a_technological_activists_agenda.html]]\n<<<\nBitTorrent creator Bram Cohen declared himself a "a technological activist" who "further[s] my goals with technology. I build systems to disseminate information, commit digital piracy, synthesize drugs . . ." \n<<<\nDoes this give //intent// to Bittorrent as Wired (in [[BitTorrent Whiz Extolled Piracy?|http://wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,68046,00.html]] ) claims ?\n\n[[Bram Cohen: My Activist's Manifesto is a Parody|http://www.corante.com/importance/archives/2005/06/29/bram_cohen_my_activists_manifesto_is_a_parody.php]] comments about this as does [[Shocking Revelations About BitTorrent|http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2005/06/shocking_revela.htm]] \n\n!!! Implications of Grokster:\n\nConclusion from [[Legal Theory|http://lsolum.blogspot.com/archives/2005_06_01_lsolum_archive.html#112006686207391975]] blog:\n"The Grokster decision may have been a minor tactical victory for content providers, but it is a stupendous strategic loss."\n\n<<<\nGrokster and the Future of P2P\nWhat are the implications of the Grokster decision for the future of P2P filesharing? Superficially, the fact that MGM prevailed in the Supreme Court might seem like a negative for P2P, I believe that quite the opposite is t