EC Psych Profs Call for APA to
Change Stance on Interrogation
For Immediate Release:
Oct. 4, 2007
Michael R. Jackson, associate professor of psychology
at Earlham, invites colleagues from across the nation to join
his department's faculty and sign the Resolution Regarding Participation
by Psychologists in Interrogations in Military Detention Centers.
RICHMOND, Ind. — The psychology
department at Earlham College has passed a resolution calling for
a change in the interrogations policy of the American Psychological
Association (APA). Breaking new ground by taking this national
leadership role, the Resolution Regarding Participation by Psychologists
in Interrogations in Military Detention Centers is the first of its
kind issued by an American college or university academic unit.
While Michael R. Jackson, the convener of
Earlham's psychology
department, acknowledged that the APA Council of Representatives
recently passed a resolution condemning torture, he says that the
well-intentioned resolution still allows psychologists to participate
in "coercive interrogations so long as these interrogations
do not cause significant pain and suffering or lasting harm."
Jackson says that not only does the APA resolution violate its
own established ethical principles and code of conduct, but that
it also continues to permit psychologists to be associated with
agencies or facilities in which prisoners are deprived of due process
of law, which, he says, is also a violation of the APA code.
"Most troubling of all," writes Jackson in a letter
to colleagues at other colleges, "by allowing psychologists
to continue to participate in the interrogations of detainees in
secret military and CIA facilities, it continues to aid in legitimizing
these interrogations and (foreign detention centers)."
The purpose of the resolution, says Jackson,
is to invite other psychology departments to join Earlham's psychology faculty
in condemning the involvement of psychologists in these types of
interrogations and to call upon the APA to take a "clear
and unambiguous stand on the issue."
Calling the APA's stance "ethically compromised," Jackson
draws on Earlham's educational mission, which is informed
by the distinctive perspectives and values of the Religious Society
of Friends (Quakers).
According to an Earlham document called Principles and Practices,
the College's educational values "are rooted in a commitment
to caring for the world we inhabit, improving human society, promoting
global education, seeking peaceful management and resolution of
conflicts, affirming the equality of all persons, and maintaining
high moral standards of personal conduct."
Morals and ethics are paramount says Jackson,
who also notes "the
AMA doesn't allow participation in these types of interrogations,
nor does the American Psychiatric Association. The APA is the only
professional association that allows its members to do that."
While Jackson says that some human rights
groups also have criticized the APA's stance, "to
my knowledge we were the first psychology department in the country
to do so, and we have been recognized by dissident groups within
APA as taking a national leadership role in opposing APA's ethically
compromised position."
Since sending his letter to other colleges
in late September, Jackson reports that the psychology department
of Guilford College in Greensboro, N.C., another historically
Quaker college, has also passed the Earlham department's
resolution.
— EC —
Contact:
Mark Blackmon, director of media relations
765/983-1256 — E-Mail
Mark

|