If publishers don't use readily available software to prevent deep linking, are they giving the world an implied license to deep link? Or is deep linking permissible regardless of the publisher's conduct and desires? Martin Schwimmer in the Trademark Blog takes the former view, and Ernest Miller in LawMeme takes the latter. What do you think?
Posted by
Peter Suber at 6/14/2002 10:20:00 AM.
The open access movement:
Putting peer-reviewed scientific and scholarly literature
on the internet. Making it available free of charge and
free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
Removing the barriers to serious research.
