Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Friday, November 19, 2004

More on OA to drug trial data

Kate Fodor, Trials of the Pharmaceutical Industry, The Scientist, November 22, 2004. Excerpt: 'Pharmaceutical companies may soon be required to register their clinical trials and publicly disclose the results, whether they show a drug in a positive, negative, or lukewarm light....In early October, citing the [GlaxoSmithKline Paxil] case as an impetus, a group of lawmakers introduced the Fair Access to Clinical Trials (FACT) Act, which is an effort to increase the transparency of clinical trials for drugs, biologics, and medical devices....The 48-page bill calls for a mandatory, electronic clinical-trial registry to be run by the government. The bill would require companies to post information about a study before patient enrollment begins and to publish a summary of the results --whether positive, negative, or inconclusive-- once the study is complete. The registry would operate as an expansion of [open-access] clinicaltrials.gov, which houses a database established in 1997 that is run by the government's National Library of Medicine. Currently, only studies of drugs for serious diseases must be registered in the database, and companies are not required to provide results of the trials. The FACT Act would require all US Phase II, III, and IV trials to be registered, with updates provided every six months until a summary of the final results is posted. Study sponsors who fail to comply would face civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day and would be ineligible to receive government grant money or contracts.' The rest of the article contains a detailed overview of drug company concerns and legislative responses.

(PS: The FACT Act has been introduced in both houses of Congress. The House bill is H.R.5252. The Senate bill is S.2933.)