Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Saturday, December 11, 2004

More on the NIH plan

From a blog posting today by McPlunk: '[Deposit in PubMed Central has become] only a "recommendation" not a requirement...in order that "grantees or smaller or not-for-profit publishers will [not] be harmed." Oh, were those the journals that got Neuroscience Conference participants to write in the NIH. Or was it the publishing giant Elsevier? Scientists really need to get organized around this issue. We all live in a "publish or perish" world, and these for-profit journals know this. I am so disappointed in the NIH for not adopting a stronger position.'