Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Friday, June 23, 2006

OA database of Costa Rica's biodiversity

Rex Dalton, Biodiversity: Cashing in on the rich coast, Nature, June 1, 2006 (accessible only to subscribers). (Thanks to Kathryn Garforth.) Excerpt:
Along Costa Rica’s Pacific coast, scientific explorers are trying to turn over a new leaf for a storied institute — the National Biodiversity Institute, or INBio....Created in 1989, INBio, based in a suburb of the capital San Jose, became an early symbol for how developing nations might participate sustainably in the biotechnology revolution. World-class researchers joined with Costa Rica’s well-trained academics, hoping to save the nation’s biodiversity — 4% of the world’s total — by making money from it....Today, other developing nations look to INBio as an example of how to achieve the goals of the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, which encourages sustainable development worldwide....

Advocates hope [that sustenance for INBio] will come from the Fogarty International Center at the US National Institutes of Health, which is giving the new bioprospecting team $3.5 million over four years....Led by chemist Jon Clardy of Harvard Medical School, the five-year project includes researchers from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, the Broad Institute — a joint venture of Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — and the Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts....The current project is designed...to be as open as possible about any potential new drug candidates. With the earlier grants, any compounds of interest left Costa Rica, disappearing behind the proprietary walls of corporate science. Clardy, who was part of the earlier ICBG when at Cornell, says he didn’t want the new programme making the same mistakes....[T]he data will be publicly accessible, in a database containing information such as where the compounds were collected and under what conditions. Clardy foresees an eventual library with some 5,000 to 10,000 compounds collected during the project. The database could even contain details on how compounds respond in various screening tests against pathogens, information that is usually considered proprietary. Clardy’s group would get first shot at studying any promising disease-fighting compounds. But eventually the data would enter the publicly accessible ChemBank.