|
Within the order Kinetoplastida
there are two major subgroups. One subgroup is the trypanosomatids,
and the other is the bodonids and related cryptobiids. The
trypanosomatids include the trypanosomes and several other
species, including Leishmania, Crithidia, Herpetomonas
and Blastocrithidia. Within both of these subgroups,
different species undergo different degrees of Uridine insertion/deletion,
but uridine insertion/deletion occurs in all of them. (see
figure 1) (Maslov, et al. 1994)
There are two degrees of
RNA editing that are seen in trypanosomatids, pan-editing
and 5'-editing. Pan-editing is where the entire gene is edited,
while 5'-editing is where only the 5' end of the mRNA molecule
is edited. Some of the genes found in the mitochondrial DNA
are broken down into two domains. In this case, when pan-editing
occurs, both domains are edited, but when 5'-editing occurs,
only one domain is edited. (Simpson et al. 2000)
In some of the species, such
as T. brucei, pan-editing occurs in almost all genes
in the maxicircle, while in others, such as L. tarentolae,
5'-editing occurs in almost all genes. A third species,
B. culicis, undergoes both 5'-editing and non-editing. In
this species, the gene MURF4 undergoes 5'-editing, while the
gene COIII is non-edited.(see
figure 1) This is interesting, because this is the first
time that a gene that undergoes pan-editing in one species
undergoes no editing in another. (Maslov, et al. 1994)
It is thought that pan-editing
was present in ancestral organisms, and that then 5' editing,
or non-editing, replaced pan-editing in several species. This
is because pan-editing has been found in early diverging branches,
suggesting that it is the ancestral trait. There are different
mechanisms for why 5'-editing replaced pan-editing. One of
these mechanisms is the thought that partially edited RNAs
underwent reverse-transcription and were made into cDNAs that
then were incorporated into maxicircles and replaced the pan-edited
genes. The reason why pan-editing was replaced with reverse
transcribed 5' edited genes was because minicircles and guideRNAs,
or gRNAs, were lost during replication and segregation in
certain species. Minicircles replicate when the cell replicates
itself during the lifecycle, and then segregate at random,
and so some daughter cells may not contain mitochondria that
have certain minicircles that encode for gRNAs. (Maslov, et
al. 1994)
T. brucei has retained
pan-editing most probably due to the fact that it uses uridine
insertion or deletion as a translational control mechanism.
The fact that T. brucei has a large amount of gRNAs
that overlap each other, instead of a few gRNAs that don't
overlap as much, as in other species, could be to prevent
the loss of the gRNAs during the creation of daughter cells,
or it could signify that this is the primitive state. (Maslov,
et al. 1994) It is thought that the fact that 5'-editing was
also retained, instead of being replaced by non-edited genes,
was probably due to translational control, to be able to produce
a methionine amino acid to begin translation with. (Simpson
et al. 2000)
It is thought that RNA editing
could have first evolved in trypanosomes due to a gene duplication
mechanism, or it could be carried over from the original mitochondrion
that was taken up by eukaryotes. (Maslov, et al. 1994) U insertion/deletion
most probably arose in the early bodonid-kinetoplastid lineage,
after the euglenoids diverged. This is thought, because RNA
editing, and gRNAs are found in genome of some of the species
from the bodonid subgroup, which is the most primitive subgroup
found in the kinetoplastid order. The next step in the evolution
of trypanosomatids is thought to be the catenation, or connection
of the kinetoplastid DNA, or kDNA, into circles, megacircles
as in T. borreli, or a network of circles as in trypanosomatids.
(Simpson et al. 2000)
It appears that RNA editing
has been found to appear during evolution several different
times in different organisms. It is thought that the reason
RNA editing has evolved is to correct the errors in the mitochondrial
DNA so that the mitochondria can function correctly to help
the cell run correctly. It also may have evolved to modify
the genotype through the RNA. (Simpson et al. 2000)
Works Cited:
Maslov, D., Avila, H., Lake, J., and
Simpson, L. (1994). Evolution of RNA editing in kinetoplastid
protozoa. Nature 368: 345-348.
Simpson, L., Thiemann, O., Savill, N., Alfonzo, J., and Maslov,
D. (2000). Evolution of RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
97: 6986-6993.
Created by Erin Sargent as part of a biology
senior seminar at Earlham College
Last updated:April 24, 2003 |